latest tweets ...

    follow me on Twitter
    Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts
    Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts

    Wednesday, April 16, 2008

    Faut-il boycotter les Crocs ?

    Marie-Claude Lortie

    Le Mardi 15 Avril 2008

    Faut-il boycotter les Crocs ?

    crocs1.jpg

    La société américaine qui, il y a quelques années, a acheté l’entreprise québécoise Créations Foam, à l’origine du plastique mou avec lequel on fabrique les sandales Crocs, a décidé de fermer l’usine de Québec.

    Résultat: 670 personnes perdent leur emploi. C’est énorme.

    Le ministre Raymond Bachand a qualifié cette décision de “capitalisme sauvage”.

    Ce qui est particulièrement triste, dans tout ça, c’est que c’est à Québec qu’ont été inventées les Crocs.

    Le succès mondial est arrivé quand une entreprise du Colorado a racheté la société et à commencé à s’occuper de la mise en marché des sandales.

    Même c’est bien à Québec qu’elles sont nées.

    Doit-on donc boycotter les sandales Crocs ?

    Tuesday, April 8, 2008

    Coming-of-Age Keeps on Coming


    ik - Off Esquire.com

    It just so happened that some of what he wanted to do had changed.

    Why he wrote the last line: I’m sitting at a desk by a window in the extreme southwest corner of our nation, twenty-three miles from the Mexican border, because some of what I wanted to do had changed. I guess this comes as no big surprise; since Creative Writing 101 they’ve been hammering the same point: “write about what you know.” I figure you can follow this for a couple of books. After that, you probably have to learn something new.

    I like to think of Deviant Behavior as a coming-of-age novel for the second thirty years of life. When we are young, we are sold the idea that coming of age is a teenage thing -- that all the important growth of body and soul is done during the years between birth and 21, whereupon we are magically granted legal status as adults, handed the keys to ourselves, and sent off into the world. When I was 21, leaving college for my first job, I seem to remember having some vague notion that after the rough childhood I’d weathered (the terrible twos, the pimply adolescence, the star-crossed college romance) things would be pretty smooth until middle age, when I’d likely freak out and buy a red sports car or dump my wife for a younger model, or both. I sallied forth, feeling very grown up, ready to tackle adulthood.

    As I discovered, as we all discover, the trials don’t stop. In truth, life is a series of coming-of-age trials. Looking back on my own life, I’ve probably had some kind of “middle age crisis” ever four to six years since I was 21. Probably this is the case with everyone.

    The hero of my novel is the picture of Washington D.C. respectability, a 29-year-old urban pioneer with a pretty wife and a job at the town’s most esteemed newspaper, a heart full of hopes and dreams, a raging ambition to create something great and important and memorable. Then his wife, whom he adores, has a child.

    And it hits him: His life will never be the same.

    I’m not going to tell you the rest of the story, though I will tell you, in words culled from the back jacket, that it involves an inferno of repressed urges and human frailties, pimps and hustlers, an accidental hooker, an honest cop, a store front prophet/marijuana dealer, a beautiful teenage runaway, an A-List gay activist, huge quantities of heroin and crack, and a diminutive billionaire who is searching for the answers to life’s greatest questions in a crystal skull.

    In short, Deviant Behavior is a novel about a young man finding his place in the world. After some searching, I have found my own place. It is here, on the coast of Southern California, in this house, in this office. I love my office. It has my things, my photos, my Best in Fencing trophy from Camp Comet, 1969. For the first six years of my working life, I worked at desk in the middle of an acre-square newsroom, spread across the fifth floor of three different buildings, housing some nine hundred other reporters and editors. It was exciting, challenging, demanding, life altering -- sort of like the experiences of grad school, a first marriage and living homeless in Grand Central Station all rolled into one. Taken together with the thousands of people I’ve met, interviewed, taught, listened to, sojourned with over 30 years as a journalist, I think you can see why I now prefer to be quietly alone.

    It is a warm blue afternoon. Checking the date, I see that it is the actual anniversary of our move here from Washington D.C. Exactly eleven years ago the furniture arrived in the big truck, driven cross-country by a skinhead teamster and his accomplices, who stole half an ounce of pot from the inside of my shoe on moving day -- no doubt it helped ease the tedium of their cross-country journey; I can’t say the same for my own. I am still finding those little green numbered inventory tags they stuck on everything -- just yesterday, one appeared mysteriously in the middle the floor. Where it came from, I have no idea; it’s like it crossed a time warp and ended up here on the Mexican travertine, a little reminder of our anniversary. I’d spent the night before the truck arrived in a sleeping bag so as to be ready for the movers’ non-specific ETA; the wife and two-point-five year old were crashed at my father-in-law’s. The horizon was clear that evening as the sun set over the Pacific. I saw a wondrous green flash. I have since seen many others. If you think it doesn’t matter where you live, that living is all about how you feel inside, you’re wrong. I figure that fair weather is good for a five percent bump in your overall outlook. Sometimes, that’s just enough.

    As I write this, I can hear the odd woody chirping sound that hummingbirds make, the distant drone of a leaf blower, the rustle of the breeze through the stand of bamboo planted out of spite many years ago by the evil absentee landlord who owns the property next door, part of his plan to disrupt the view from this room here in the pool house -- at the time the feud was initiated, this building was occupied by the teenaged son of the previous owner and known as “The Love Shack.” Here in my office, I, too, am free to pursue the thing that I love, the craft of writing.

    When I first occupied it, my office boasted a rusty wet bar, thick shag carpeting, a fake (gas) fireplace -- more remnants of the randy previous owner. (I’d gotten the house for a song during the last recession, in ‘96; it had taken everything I had, there’d been no money left for improvements.) There is of course a pool to go with the pool house. I seldom go in. My son swims sometimes. He prefers the ocean. But without the pool, I suppose, there would have been no pool house, so in that way I feel indebted to the thing, and hence spend precious dollars to keep it from turning green. The pool and its companion building are twenty steps or so down the hill from our main domicile, a modest stucco affair perched on the edge of a canyon of fragrant costal sage and native cacti, home to snakes, skunks, opossums, and raccoons, a particularly violent pair of which had a full-out rumble the other night the roof of my little building, rolling around and scrapping like a pair of drunken sailors, shrieking and growling, the shit and fur literally flying off the roof. (I had to be rescued by my wife, who shined a powerful flashlight out the living room window to scare them away.)

    Two years ago, due to excessive mold, the inside of the pool house was finally gutted. The inside of the fake fireplace was writhing with termites -- they look a lot like maggots, elicit a similar icy feeling in my gut. I’d never considered it before, but termites are a lot like maggots -- living off the stuff that’s dead, a sort of natural garbage removal system. Now, post-renovation, my asthma is much better. The surfaces are all light wood and Mexican stone. I have shelves for my books, files for my papers. The mottled windows were also replaced; I can see clearly now the Pacific Ocean, one half mile distant as a bird flies. At the moment there is a red-tailed hawk making lazy circles in the sky, as poetic and corny as a line from a Broadway musical, yet somehow no less moving. At any moment the hawk will spot his next meal. He’ll hang in the air the way hawks do -- so thrillingly cool, his wings backpedaling like some mythological god of war-- then execute a fearless dive. Back in Washington, D.C., we lived in a century-old townhouse in the ghetto, about a mile from the White House. You could buy crack on my street. There were drive-by shootings at the playground. Life hung in the balance. (This, of course, is the setting of Deviant Behavior.) In some ways, my new ‘hood in Socal is no less violent. Think of the field mouse or baby opossum that is about to become the hawk’s dinner.

    Typically, I start my days making breakfast for my son, a peanut butter and strawberry jelly sandwich on healthy whole wheat bread, with a glass of Naked Juice. Though he has just turned 13 and claims to have made out with a girl in La Quinta during our family vacation over Christmas break, he still pads out sleepily into the living room each morning carrying his two beanie doggies, which were exchanged many moons ago for his two pacifiers. I get the coffee going for the wife, bring in the two newspapers (three on Sunday). At a little past seven, I wave them off to school and commute the thirty or so steps to my office. I begin with email -- like scales for a singer or stretches for an athlete, it gets me warmed up. I try to keep it under fifteen minutes -- thirty at most. If I get sidetracked on email, I start feeling antsy. By the way, I have my email set so that it cannot interrupt me while I work. In order to receive an email, I have to click “send/receive.” This way, email is my tool and not vice versa.

    My morning energy is always the clearest. I guard it like a prodigious child. I try not to let anything spoil it. There is a big clock on the wall, the kind we used to have in our elementary school classrooms, a simple white face with simple black hands and numbers. Every time I look up at it, a whole lot of time has passed. When I am engaged in writing, I never notice the time pass. It just flies by, you know, whoosh. In this way, writing for me is a lot like sex -- so absorbing that I never watch the clock. (Of course, writing takes a whole lot longer.) When I’m writing, I feel like I’m exactly where I’m supposed to be doing exactly what I’m supposed to be doing. (Ditto sex.) If I can spend five or six hours a day at writing -- not counting emails, phone calls, etc -- I’ve had a productive day.

    Though I am not always happy with what I write every day, I keep pushing through until I am. I try to see myself as a technician, as a craftsman. The minute you think of yourself as an artist, you’re done. You are absolute toast. You are all those people you swore you would never become. Yes, I believe in magic. Yes, there is a divine spark -- things appear on the screen; I don’t know where the hell they come from. But the moment after the inspiration, the moment after the magic, the miracle, the moment after that, the moment after I take a split second to marvel, I get my sorry ass to work. I get to sweating. The inspiration, like they say, must be followed by the perspiration. The thoughts and ideas may come from the ether, but as soon as they do, the task is clear: To render them into precise and evocative prose. To honor the appearance of blessed magic with heroic effort. I can not imagine how people wrote with quill pens. I have rarely ever scratched out a perfect sentence the first time. To me, writing is rewriting. Each sentence is slowly and carefully constructed and deconstructed, visited and revisited -- cursor left, cursor right, home, end, insert, delete, backspace erase (my favorite key, often the first to wear out on my keyboard, that or the letter e). Likewise each paragraph, each section, each chapter -- until the sound and the feel and the imagery and the pacing and the logic is just right. Then I go over everything one more time, just to be sure. Later I’ll print it out and edit with a pen. Key in the changes; one more read.

    When I was in college, I tried to write fiction. My stories sort of sounded good -- good imagery and cadence and word choice -- but they had nothing to say. They went nowhere. I was a young kid with good intentions, with a love of typing. But I knew nothing of the world. I knew nothing about myself. That’s why I was drawn to journalism -- for the material. The stories were there, ready made. I just had to find and reconstruct. Through journalism -- nearly thirty years of meeting people and going places and seeing things -- I have learned about the world, I have learned about myself and my craft. But the worst thing about journalism is that you have to rely on other people and their stories. You have to spend large chunks of your life living someone else’s life instead of your own. You have to spend large chunks of your life away from your wife, you son, your beloved office with the view. And you have to tell the story exactly as it happened, because that is the responsibility of journalism -- the story has to be true. Over the past three decades, I have had the privilege of telling some amazing true stories. My collections -- Revenge of the Donut Boys, Scary Monsters and Super Freaks, and the upcoming Wounded Warriors (the title piece is an expansion of an Esquire piece, thanks again to my mother ship for another great assignment) -- are my pride and joy, my badges of achievement in the trade of literary journalism, a trade I hope to ply for many years to come.

    But as we all know, there is one huge problem with journalism:

    The truth sometimes gets in the way of a good story.

    With Deviant Behavior, my first novel, I have finally been allowed to break the bonds of journalism. There are composite characters, there are fabricated incidents, there are scenarios run amok. Nothing is true. Yet everything is true-to-life. Well, almost everything. And even though I did a great deal of research to create a sense of documentary super-realism, a sense of plausibility that would string my reader along, there were no rules to tell me what I could and couldn’t say or do. In the novel, for example, an account of someone smoking a hit of freebase cocaine is told with the same sort of precision and detail as is devoted to another account of someone experiencing an opening in the fabric of the universe, courtesy of a crystal skull, a relic retrieved from the lost continent of Atlantis…

    All of it created here in my chair, by my window, just down the hill from my house, near my family.

    When I was young, I thought my writing came first, that everything else needed to take a back seat. Over the years, I have come to see life as a total package. As a father and a husband, a long-time hoops coach and soccer manager (now retired and watching from the stands), a gardener (as choir not hobby), a citizen in our community, I have the kind of small but weighty obligations that every man has. And the big but weighty ones, too. It helps a lot when you can be there. In family matters, I have come to believe, presence is utmost.

    When I am in my office I am a happy man. I have a sense of place. It is where I can do what I want to do.

    And still be close to those who love and need me.

    Thursday, October 4, 2007

    Jane Ash Poitras: Rituals

    A short article I wrote for Mass Art Guide (MAG), published this month.

    By Ian Kenney

    Reconciling our past; understanding our nature as individuals and as societies; exploring the jagged edges that divide our personal and cultural identities. Exploration of these themes is certainly not new to contemporary art. But we sometimes forget that these same issues are the ones that many Aboriginal people and their communities have been struggling with for generations. Working through these issues is a necessary part of the process of healing, as present social and cultural locations are redefined and renegotiated.

    Artist Jane Ash Poitras not only expresses the disorder of the healing process, she celebrates it. In her exhibition of paintings at Ottawa’s Galerie d'art Vincent this fall, Poitras pays tribute to the healers, and the rituals of healing.

    The body of Poitras’ work offers a powerful representation of the chaotic search for ones’ social and cultural location. Works such as “Cosmic Ancestors” and “Shaman Waiting for Birth” are typical, in which expressionistic blends of vivid, earthy colours, and bold textures evoke the mystical healing energy surrounding traditional Aboriginal symbols (the sun, the elements, spiritual symbols). In “Watering the Gift of Life”, also featured in this exhibit, the same primal colours, shapes, textures and references frame a simple photograph of a native woman gently watering a flower.

    By mixing old with the new in this way, Poitras reminds us that it is through our past that we make sense of our present.

    Poitras knows intimately the borders between the traditional and the contemporary. A member of the Cree Nation, she was born in 1951 near Fort Chipewyan Alberta, and raised by a European family. First completing a degree in microbiology, she then studied fine arts, eventually completing a master’s degree in printmaking. It was through her art that she began to explore her First Nation identity.

    Her explorations took her to where few other Native artists had gone to that point. She, along with a handful of other artists, such as Ojibwe artist Carl Beam, were the first to be accepted in mainstream art circles, while still remaining true to their Native roots.

    As gallery owner Vincent Fortier says, “She brought Native art to the level of contemporary art. After her, it was no longer treated like a craft as it had been in the past, and she was the first to be treated the same as other artists.”

    Galerie D’Art Vincent
    October 21 to November 3, 2007
    Artist in attendance on
    October 21 from 2–5 PM
    1 Rideau St./Chateau Laurier
    Main Lobby, Ottawa, ON
    T: 613-241-1144
    www.inuitfinearts.com
    info@galleryvincent.com

    See the article in the October issue of MAG, or online here.

    Thursday, April 27, 2006

    My Best Posts

    Ok, so I don't write as much of my own words on this thing as I post other people's works. Articles, news items, photos, really this is more a scrapbook than anything else. But, in scanning my posts over the last year and half (I am writing this at the end of April 2006 by the way), there are a few which I quite like. So here is my greatest hits as it were (except there were very few hits other than from my own browser, but you get the idea) :

    Tuesday, March 21, 2006

    Méditations Reader Profile Results

    Well, it's that time of year again, when we look at actually who reads this poor excuse for a blog. And the winner is...

    The Government of Canada, Office of the Solicitor General (now Public Security and Emergency Preparedness Canada or something like that).

    Yes, that's right, SolGen seems to like to read Méditations over their morning muffin. Perhaps I'm part of their calesthenics program. Or maybe they think I'm really communicating coded messages to sleeper cells here in the Nation's Capital. All pretty impressive for a government department that doesn't really exist anymore. In any event, here's to SolGen, and their undying support of a dead blog.

    (In second place was, once again this year, Consilium. Go figure!)

    Wednesday, January 25, 2006

    La Vie Simple?

    Ce matin, j'ai déjeuné avec un de mes plus proches amis. On se voit tous les jours, mais ce n'est pas souvent qu'on prend le temps de passer même quelques minutes tranquilles entre nous.

    Il ne travaille pas, mon ami. Il n'a pas d'emplois, pas d'enfants, pas de femme. Il passe ses journées à la maison, soit à l'éxtérieur, soit à l'intérieur, selon la météo. Il n'a pas de salaire, mais il ne paie pas d'impôts, il n'a pas de factures, ni soucis d'argent non plus. C'est vrai qu'il reçoit pas mal de choses des autres, surtout moi et mes deux filles (et mes voisins à coté de temps en temps), mais généralement il vit sa vie libre des choses qui nous font tourner en rond tous les jours.

    Ce matin, au déjeuner, et en pensant à sa liberté, je me suis demandé s'il n'était pas plus content que nous autres. Même s'il ne possède rien, il semble heureux de vivre, de dormir quand il le veut, de voir ses amis (il est toujours content de me voir, et j'aime ça), de manger et de boire, de travailler sur ses petits projets dans le jardin. Ce matin, je lui ai demandé son opinion sur le résultat des élections. Comme d'habitude, il n'avait rien à m'offrir. Il reste toujours silencieux sur les questions politiques. Mais je sais que ça ne le dérange pas.

    Je me suis demandé aussi si moi aussi je serais plus content si je vivais ma vie comme la sienne, en me débarassant des possessions, des horaires fixes, des questions d'argent, des besoins matériaux. Certes, il serait plus difficiles pour moi, avec deux enfants à faire vivre, et une hypothèque, et un faible pour le café. Mais je crois qu'il existe des leçons dans la vie de mon ami. Et je vais essayer d'en apprendre le plus possible.

    (Oh. Voici une photo de mon ami. Il a l'air content, non?)

    Tuesday, January 24, 2006

    The Tories: Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't

    Ok, so one of the longest campaigns in Canadian history is finally over, the ballots are in, they've all been counted, except for those that were eaten in protest which by now have all been digested, and we have a new government. Congratulations to Stephen Harper and the Conservatives for winning enough seats to form a minority government.

    So now everyone is commenting on what it all means. The last thing we need is more commentary from another blogger. So here goes....

    Who were the winners?

    Clearly, the Conservatives. As much as the Liberal vote collapsed from an inept campaign and excessive baggage (there's a mixed metaphor in there somewhere), the election was not just lost by the previous government. The Conservatives ran a skillful campaign, tailored their policies to suit the mood of the country and - this is important - somehow managed to give Quebecers a vehicle to express their concerns and desire for change within the federation. I'm still convinced this was more of a fluke than anything else. Quebecers are very good at smelling winners, but the Conservatives made it comfortable for them to pile on as they usually do. This is exactly what a "national" party should do.

    But the Tories aren't the only winners. Given all that excess baggage carried around by the Liberals, finishing with more than 100 seats makes the Liberals winners too. Despite all the gaffes and shenanigans they had to explain, they still ended up with more seats than the Conservatives did last time round. Many observers were expecting to see the Liberals wiped off the map. In Québec, the Bloc even talked about sweeping the province and "making the Liberals disappear." Certainly, the Libs took a big hit in Québec, where the Gomery Commission played like a soap opera for months. But elsewhere, the Liberals hung on. Whoever is chosen to rebuild the Party now will not have to start from scratch as did the Tories after the 1993 election. We may see the Liberals back in the game sooner than many had predicted.

    Who were the losers?

    From my perspective, the only losers were ... the Bloc. The BQ was expected to sweep the province, taking a majority of the popular vote and gaining seats. Instead, their showing last night is signficantly less than what they managed to achieve in 2004. Less popular vote than last time, and two fewer seats. Still, they performed well. And had they perhaps not come out making all sorts of wild claims and plans and hopes for a BQ sweep, they would not today appear to have lost their momentum. It should be no surprise that, today, Gilles Duceppe, the BQ leader, is downplaying the vote, saying it has nothing to do with "sovereignty." All the ethnic breast beating over the last few months now seems pretty hollow.

    So, what have we learned?

    In Québec, we've learned that, given a credible alternative, voters are still keen to work with "federalist" parties. Not to discount the independence movement in Québec, support for the Bloc is, pretty clearly to me at least, still primarily a form of protest, except for a certain hard core. Even in those ridings where the Bloc won, a quick scan of last night's results shows that, in many cases, the "federalist" vote was split among the Liberals and the Conservatives, allowing the Bloc to win the seat by a relatively small margin. For referendum watchers, this is good news.

    The next few months are critical for the Tories. They now need to deliver to Québec. Stephen (may I call you Stephen?), you better make things happen. Or you can expect to be escorted to the door quicker than you can say poutine.

    And what if the Tories' promises to Québec are carried out? Well, unfortunately, Québec will then be back asking for more. And we'll start the game all over again. That's when the Tories will learn that Québec's demands are insatiable, and the whole stand off between Québec's "aspirations" and "English Canada's" alleged inflexibility will be renewed and confirmed.

    So, in Québec, the Tories are damned if they do and damned if they don't.

    Welcome to the Prime Minister's Office, Stephen.

    ;-)

    iank

    Monday, January 23, 2006

    Why your name is not mentioned anywhere on my blog

    "You" are no doubt wondering why "your" name is not mentioned on my blog, and why "you" are not in any of "my" photos.

    Not everyone wants to have their identity revealed, or to be talked about - even in a third person kind of way - on some bored bozo's blog. As a result, I take great strides to avoid any references to the people in my life on here. That may change someday, however. For obvious reasons. :-)

    Even my kids are not talked about much on here. In most cases (but admittedly not all - I should fix that), photos of them, are of their backs. I should go through and remove their names too I guess.

    Which brings me to the question "you" are surely asking: "just who reads this thing?" The short answer is...me!! Ya, I have people tripping over my site who I've never heard of, usually people from outside Canada who find my blog through a news item I may have re-posted here. But other than that, I am read by a couple of close friends and me.

    Still, the potential exists for the world to know about me and everything around me. And so, I will remain silent on "you" and "your identity". For now.

    But don't think I think any less of you. Or deny your existence. ;-)

    Wednesday, September 28, 2005

    Jean Resigns Unexpectedly, Goat Becomes New GG

    In a surprise move, newly-installed Governor-General Michaelle Jean resigned from office only one day after being sworn-in. Offering no reason for her change of heart, Jean cooperated fully with officials in Buckingham Palace and Rideau Hall to ensure a quick transition to a new Governor-General.

    Above, Jean and her daughter Marie-Eden are seen officially handing over power to Baptiste the Goat, who becomes Canada's 28th Governer General, and the first to speak neither English nor French. Until today's move, Baptiste had been touted as a possible Liberal Party candidate for the riding of Pontiac. A goat has not sat in the House of Commons since the departure of Deborah Grey of the former Canadian Alliance Party in 2003.

    During the hastily-prepared ceremony, Baptiste wore a royal blue cape, and a white fur coat. In a prepared statement, Baptiste noted that "the time for the two solitudes is back on."

    Wednesday, July 27, 2005

    Appearances


    I owe someone an apology.

    I just returned from lunch at the neighbourhood diner (pictures to come). Diners, of course, seem to attract the denim wearing, unshaven, and unwashed which is why they tend to stick out in the nation's capital, and why I prefer to eat in them. I would much rather eat at the Chateau Lafayette than the Chateau Laurier. Well, usually.

    So I was surprised at the conversation I overheard from the next booth. A woman, maybe 50 years old, dressed awkwardly in old, used clothes, and certainly not in the usual government garb, was joined by a man, maybe 55, overweight, long scraggly beard, with what looked to be a permanently grumpy look on his face. To be honest, I assumed he was another Bank street-dwelling pub urchin. She saw him come in and called him over to her table.

    I expected them to talk about hockey, or about tv shows, or about how so-and-so got into another fight last night. Instead, she pulls out the National Post and says "here, I wanna read you something." She then read at length an article about Jane Fonda. She then put down the paper and presented her views on how Jane Fonda probably made a mistake in speaking out about the Vietnam War, but that she contributed to how we framed our thinking about the war and our response to it. Her interlocutor agreed, and added that it was interesting how her career never really recovered after her public stance.

    Ok, so maybe this wasn't a discussion on the geo-political dimensions of American domestic economic policy. But I was both shocked and disappointed about my prejudices. Here I am, someone who detests labels and who works feverishly to rid myself of them as much as possible, continues to label people by how they look. I assumed they wouldn't even pick up a newspaper, let alone have anything interesting to add to the debate.

    So I apologize to my diner-mates, and promise to try harder to stop judging people by how they look. And I look forward to some good conversation the next time I need a burger and a bottomless cup of coffee.

    Wednesday, January 26, 2005

    Cultural Democracy

    What you are reading is but one example of the cultural consumer as producer. Part of a revolution in the cultural sphere of which, I believe, we have only seen the tip of the iceberg.

    In 1995-96, I did my master's thesis on cultural policy in Canada. Using youth culture as the focus of my research, I prepared an inventory of the various programs and policies of the federal, provincial, and municipal (where they existed at all) governments which claimed to support the cultural lives of young people. And there were a lot, if I recall correctly. It seems to me I had a long list of schools, grant programs, funding to community groups, etc. all aiming to enhance the cultural lives of young people, by exposing them to particular cultural experiences.

    My argument was that, if we are trying to enhance the cultural lives of people, and maybe support the development of a unique cultural identity along the way (if you're not Canadian, you'll never understand why this is critical!), then we're doing things backwards.

    Most of the things cultural policies in Canada do is expose people to what I simply called "cultural products": music, films, television shows, books, all which meet some sort of test as to their Canadianness, generally speaking and, of course, an accepted level of being "good". But through this lens, the average Canadian is seen only as a cultural consumer who needs to be connected with the right cultural market.

    But looking at Cultural Theory, we see that people make real culture out of the stuff that's lying around them. Yes, that includes music, films, television shows, and books, but it also includes sports, clothes, food, stuff they buy at Wal-mart, the internet (it wasn't around when I was doing my thesis), and the things they do with their spare time, with their families, their friends, or all by themselves. They "consume" all these things, sure, but as the raw materials to be moulded into something which reflects their own unique identity, their own needs, and what they want to express, either as a group or as an individual.

    The classic example is punk rockers. They used clothes, safety pins, chains, as well as aggressive music to express a certain social and cultural position they were living. Originally, it was working class kids in industrial England, who were expressing their frustrations with being working-class, unemployed, dispossessed, powerless. Transplanted to Canada, however, the same symbols took on a new meaning when middle class suburban kids did the same thing. Still, it was the kids who put things together and made it work for them, not the producers of the safety pins!!

    The point is that culture is a process, and it is a lived-activity. As a result, if we really want to enhance the cultural lives of people, we should support them in doing whatever it is they are doing on their own, not try to steer them in a different direction that suits some program criteria. We should also treat them not as cultural consumers, but as cultural producers - which we all are, everyday.

    The thing is, people are going to do it anyway. And blogs are an excellent example. Everyone can be a published writer now! Photo blogs make everyone who wants to be a published photographer too! And look at what they're doing! (visit www.fotolog.net to see some of the creative things people are doing with their digital cameras). Music is downloaded and shared, and a lot of bands deliberately post their music to music sharing sites to get heard, not caring at all what Metallica thinks about it!

    The means of cultural production have been taken over by the people, people!! And you're participating in it by reading this blog! Vive la démocratie culturelle!!

    Monday, January 10, 2005

    Brad and Jen

    Today, like most of you, I was shocked to learn that Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston were ending their marriage of 4 years. This news hit me in the head with a splat the way the newspaper does when I sleep on the porch on a rainy night.

    I hope you will join me in remembering the good times. And don't forget how painful this must be for both Brad and Jen. I mean, they must have really tried to save the marriage, right? Oh the pain they must have felt. I can just imagine the long talks they must have had, late into the night, as they lay in bed, trying to expose their raw feelings about how to make their marriage last. Just Brad, Jen, his agent, her lawyer, their publicists.

    God, what will they do now? I can't even bear to think. Sure, Brad will probably lose himself in his work, as so many men do after a painful break-up. And Jen? Well, I don't really know what Jen will do but I'm sure her agent is working on that. She has an agent, right? I mean, what does she do anyway?

    Light a candle for Brad and Jen. And hug those you love. The world will heal. But only just.